Browsing by Author "Rolo, F"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Alterações de redes cerebrais funcionais em pacientes com disfunção eréctil psicogénica: um estudo de ressonância magnética funcionalPublication . Antunes, H; Rolo, F; Sousa, L; Tavares da Silva, E; Cera, N; Carvalho, J; Quinta-Gomes, A; Pereira, R; Oliveira, C; Castelhano, J; Janssen, E; Figueiredo, A; Castelo-Branco, N; Nobre, P
- Artérias renais múltiplas na transplantação renal: será um problema atualmente?Publication . Carvalho, J; Nunes, P; Dinis, P; Tavares da Silva, E; Marques, V; Parada, B; Marconi, L; Moreira, P; Roseiro, A; Bastos, C; Rolo, F; Dias, V; Figueiredo, A
- Cadaveric donor factor variations during a 12-year period: influence on kidney transplant outcomesPublication . Nunes, P; Parada, B; Pratas, J; Roseiro, A; Figueiredo, A; Macário, F; Rolo, F; Mota, AOur purpose was to evaluate changes in cadaveric donor factors between 1993 and 2004 and their impact on the short- and long-term outcomes of renal transplants in a single center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cadaveric renal transplants performed in our unit between 1993 and 2004 were divided in two groups of identical length: A (n = 455; 1993-1998) and B (n = 465; 1999-2004). Major differences related to donor, graft, and recipient factors were analyzed between groups and correlated with main outcome parameters. Recipient age, gender, weight, etiology of end-stage renal disease, average length of dialysis, and cold ischemia were not different in the two periods. RESULTS: Grafts harvested in our hospital were more frequent in group A (92.3 vs 78.2%; P < .005). Traumatic causes of death were more frequent before 1999: 90.9 vs 70.9% (P < .001). Mean donor age was higher after 1999: 31.37 vs 35.94 years (P < .005). Female donors were more frequent in the second period: 20.5 vs 26.6% (P < .05). Mean donor weight was also higher: 52.36 vs 67.86 kg (P < .05). All of these differences were unfavourable characteristics regarding graft outcomes. Delayed graft function (A = 13%, B = 24.2%), acute rejection episodes (A = 41.2%, B = 28%), and chronic allograft dysfunction (A = 23.5%, B = 14.4%) were also significantly different between the two cohorts (P < .005). Graft function (serum creatinine at 1 and 2 years), patient and graft survivals, causes of graft loss, and of patient death were similar across time. CONCLUSION: The unfavorable tendency in the quality of cadaveric donors during the last 12 years had no negative impact on graft function and patient outcome.
- Do elderly patients deserve a kidney graft?Publication . Nunes, P; Mota, A; Parada, B; Figueiredo, A; Rolo, F; Bastos, C; Macário, FPURPOSE: Compare renal transplant long-term outcomes among recipients aged 60 years or older with those in younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 103 transplants in recipients above 60 years of age for the influence of key factors related to the graft and patient. The results were compared with 1060 transplant recipients aged 18 to 59 years. RESULTS: The mean ages were 62.93 and 40.35 years for the older and younger group. The older group showed a higher prevalence of obesity and unknown etiologies for the end-stage renal disease. Important comorbidity was significantly more frequent among recipients aged more than 60 years, mainly of a cardiovascular nature (56% vs 18.5%). Donor age (39.75 vs 31.59 years), cold ischemia time (22.43 vs 20.49 hours) and human leukocyte antigen compatibilities (2.59 vs 2.36) were significantly greater in the older subset. After a mean follow-up of 4.72 and 6.07 years for the older versus younger group, we found no differences in initial graft function, acute rejection rate, and serum creatinine/clearance. Patient and graft survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years were lower among the 60+ group. There were no differences in graft survival censored for death with a functioning graft, namely, 95.1%, 89.4%, and 81.2% for the 60+ cohort. The main cause of graft loss in the older group was death with a functioning graft. CONCLUSION: Renal transplantation should be considered for selected patients older than 60 years. Despite a shorter life expectancy, they benefit from it similar to younger recipients.
- Efficacy of renal preservation: comparative study of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions.Publication . Nunes, P; Mota, A; Figueiredo, A; Macário, F; Rolo, F; Dias, V; Parada, BOBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy of Celsior and University of Wisconsin (UW) solutions on the perfusion and cold storage of renal grafts for human transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analyses of 313 kidney transplants were performed between 2002 and 2005; group A (n = 160), UW solution and group B (n = 153), Celsior solution were used in the preservation of the organs. The mean donor age was lower in group B (group A = 42.67 years vs group B = 38.96 years; P < .05), living donors were more frequent in the UW group (group A = 10% vs group B = 0.9%; P < .001). Multiorgan procurement procedures were more common in the Celsior group (group A = 75% vs group B = 81.7%; P < .001). Recipients with no associated comorbidities were more frequent in the UW group (group A = 50% vs group B = 36%; P < .001). Recipient mean age, cold ischemia time, and HLA matches were comparable. RESULTS: Delayed graft function (group A = 22.7% vs group B = 20.6%), acute rejections (group A = 21.4% vs group B = 18.4%), and serum creatinine at 6 months (group A = 1.75 vs group B = 1.67 mg/dL), 1 year (group A = 1.47 vs group B = 1.74 mg/dL), and 2 years (group A = 1.43 vs group B = 1.58 mg/dL) showed no differences (P = NS). Graft (group A = 82.23% vs group B = 84.11%) and patient (group A = 93% vs group B = 93.69%) survivals at 3 years were similar (P = NS). There were no differences in the causes of graft loss. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of UW and Celsior solutions is equivalent in the cold storage and renal preservation for transplantation.
- Isquémia fria de 18h: será que os nossos resultados desafiam as Guidelines?Publication . Carvalho, J; Nunes, P; Dinis, P; Antunes, H; Lourenço, M; Tavares da Silva, E; Parada, B; Marconi, L; Moreira, P; Roseiro, A; Bastos, C; Rolo, F; Dias, V; Figueiredo, A
- Mesa 4 –“Armadilhas” urológicas: Casos clínicos; O “erro” em Medicina – Oportunidade de aprendizagemPublication . Ribeiro, P; Eliseu, M; Rolo, F
- Pediatric renal transplantation: comparative study with renal transplantation in the adult populationPublication . Parada, B; Figueiredo, A; Nunes, P; Bastos, C; Macário, F; Roseiro, A; Dias, V; Rolo, F; Mota, APURPOSE: To retrospectively review our experience with pediatric renal transplantation and to compare the results with the adult population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1981 and August 2003, 74 renal transplants were performed in patients < or =18 years at the time of the transplant--the pediatric group versus 1153 patients in the adult group. We analyzed various risk factors for actuarial kidney graft and patient survivals using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median ages were 13.8 +/- 3.5 and 42.6 +/- 2.4 years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the human leukocyte antigen matching or immunosuppression. There was, however, a younger donor age and shorter ischemia time in the pediatric group. Overall, kidney transplant survival rates for patients < or =18 years at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were 94.4%, 91.3%, 70.6%, and 58.2%, respectively, with no significant difference for patients older than 18 (91.2%, 89.3%, 78.8%, 60.5%, P = .4325). There was a significantly decreased graft survival in the adult group at 10 years when the donor age was over 60 years and when the ischemia time was > or =20 hours. The incidence of delayed graft function and the creatinine levels of functioning grafts did not differ between the two groups. During the follow-up, acute rejections were more frequent in the younger group. Patient survival in the pediatric group at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years was 98.6%, 98.8%, 98.6%, and 90.3%, respectively, significantly lower in the adult group (95.3%, 94.0%, 87.9%, 76.8%, P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation may be successfully performed in the pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease. Overall graft survival at 10 years did not differ significantly between the two groups. There is a higher incidence of acute rejections but longer patient survival in the pediatric population
- Será a obesidade um pesadelo na transplantação renal?Publication . Carvalho, J; Nunes, P; Dinis, P; Lourenço, M; Tavares da Silva, E; Parada, B; Marconi, L; Moreira, P; Roseiro, A; Bastos, C; Rolo, F; Dias, V; Figueiredo, A
- Simultaneous renal transplantation and native nephrectomy in patients with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney diseasePublication . Nunes, P; Mota, A; Alves, R; Figueiredo, A; Parada, B; Macário, F; Rolo, FOur objective was to study the influence on transplant outcome of unilateral native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys at the time of renal transplantation among patients with end-stage renal disease owing to autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 159 renal transplants in patients with ADPKD divided into two groups according to the need to perform a unilateral native nephrectomy owing to enlarged kidneys (N+; n = 143) versus those not (N0; n = 16) needing this procedure. Parameters related to the donors, grafts, recipients, and operative data were correlated with short- and long-term outcomes. The groups were homogeneous in terms of recipient and donor ages, genders, HLA compatibilities, and length of pretransplant dialysis. RESULTS: When no nephrectomy was needed surgery length was shorter (N0, 3.01 vs. N+, 4.23 hours; P < .001), less intraoperative crystalloids were infused (N0, 1.84 vs. N+, 2.76 L; P < .001), and less plasma (N0, 2.07 vs. N+, 2.93 U; P < .05), or blood (N0, 1.05 vs. N+, 1.81 U; P < .05) transfusions were required. Hospital stay was similar (N0, 12.70 vs N+, 16.50 days; P not significant [NS]). There was only one urologic complication in the nephrectomy group. There were no differences (P = NS) in rates of delayed graft function (N0, 19.9%; N+, 12.5%), acute rejections (N0, 25.5%; N0, 33.3%), chronic allograft dysfunction (N0, 15.8%; N+, 28.6%). Graft function at 1 month as well as 1 and 5 years were comparable. Patient and graft survivals were similar at 1 and 5 years. There were no differences in the causes of graft loss or patient death. CONCLUSION: In patients with ADPKD native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys may be safely performed during the transplant procedure with no repercussions on the length of hospital stay, graft short- and long-term function and patient survival. However the procedure eads to a longer operative time and greater need for fluids and blood products.