Browsing by Author "Marconi, L"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- An unusual cause of acute cardiogenic shock in the operating roomPublication . Baptista, R; Fonseca, J; Marconi, L; Furriel, F; Prieto, D; Bento, C; Antines, MJ; Figueiredo, AA 51-year-old man with a renal carcinoma with inferior vena cava (IVC) invasion was referred to our hospital for the performance of a radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombus excision. To prevent embolism, an IVC filter was implanted the day before surgery below the suprahepatic veins. On nephrectomy completion, the clinical status of the patient started to deteriorate and an unsuccessful attempt was made to excise the IVC thrombus. The patient developed profound refractory hypotension without significant bleeding and worsening splanchnic stasis was noted. A transesophageal echocardiogram was immediately performed in the operating room, revealing a hemispheric mass protruding from the IVC ostium to the right atrium, completely blocking all venous return. Volume depletion was evident by low left and right atrial volumes and increased septum mobility. No other abnormalities were found that could explain the shock, namely ventricular dysfunction or valvular disease. Cardiac surgery consultation was immediately obtained, ultimately deciding to perform a median sternotomy with direct exploration of right atrium. Under cardiopulmonary bypass, a 6-cm long thrombotic mass was identified, involving the IVC filter, blocking all lower body venous return; the removal of the mass reversed the shock. The patient had an uneventful recovery. Adverse outcomes associated with IVC filters are common. Our case highlights the importance of a team approach to rapid changes in hemodynamic status in the operating room, including the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the cardiologist. It also emphasizes the pivotal role of transesophageal echocardiogram in the clinical evaluation of severely unstable patient
- Artérias renais múltiplas na transplantação renal: será um problema atualmente?Publication . Carvalho, J; Nunes, P; Dinis, P; Tavares da Silva, E; Marques, V; Parada, B; Marconi, L; Moreira, P; Roseiro, A; Bastos, C; Rolo, F; Dias, V; Figueiredo, A
- EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.Publication . Ljungberg, B; Bensalah, K; Canfield, S; Dabestani, S; Hofmann, F; Hora, M; Kuczyk, MA; Lam, T; Marconi, L; Merseburger, AS; Mulders, P; Powles, T; Staehler, MThe European Association of Urology Guideline Panel for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for RCC management. OBJECTIVES: To provide an update of the 2010 RCC guideline based on a standardised methodology that is robust, transparent, reproducible, and reliable. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: For the 2014 update, the panel prioritised the following topics: percutaneous biopsy of renal masses, treatment of localised RCC (including surgical and nonsurgical management), lymph node dissection, management of venous thrombus, systemic therapy, and local treatment of metastases, for which evidence synthesis was undertaken based on systematic reviews adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, trial registries, conference proceedings) were searched (January 2000 to November 2013) including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or controlled studies with a comparator arm. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment and qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the evidence were performed. The remaining sections of the document were updated following a structured literature assessment. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: All chapters of the RCC guideline were updated. For the various systematic reviews, the search identified a total of 10,862 articles. A total of 151 studies reporting on 78,792 patients were eligible for inclusion; where applicable, data from RCTs were included and meta-analyses were performed. For RCTs, there was low RoB across studies; however, clinical and methodological heterogeneity prevented data pooling for most studies. The majority of studies included were retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts based on single or multi-institutional data or national registries. The exception was for systemic treatment of metastatic RCC, in which several RCTs have been performed, resulting in recommendations based on higher levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The 2014 guideline has been updated by a multidisciplinary panel using the highest methodological standards, and provides the best and most reliable contemporary evidence base for RCC management. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology Guideline Panel for Renal Cell Carcinoma has thoroughly evaluated available research data on kidney cancer to establish international standards for the care of kidney cancer patients.
- Isquémia fria de 18h: será que os nossos resultados desafiam as Guidelines?Publication . Carvalho, J; Nunes, P; Dinis, P; Antunes, H; Lourenço, M; Tavares da Silva, E; Parada, B; Marconi, L; Moreira, P; Roseiro, A; Bastos, C; Rolo, F; Dias, V; Figueiredo, A
- Local treatments for metastases of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic reviewPublication . Dabestani, S; Marconi, L; Hofmann, F; Stewart, F; Lamb, TB; Canfield, SE; Staehler, M; Powles, T; Ljungberg, B; Bex, ALocal treatment of metastases such as metastasectomy or radiotherapy remains controversial in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. To investigate the benefits and harms of various local treatments, we did a systematic review of all types of comparative studies on local treatment of metastases from renal cell carcinoma in any organ. Interventions included metastasectomy, radiotherapy modalities, and no local treatment. The results suggest that patients treated with complete metastasectomy have better survival and symptom control (including pain relief in bone metastases) than those treated with either incomplete or no metastasectomy. Nevertheless, the available evidence was marred by high risks of bias and confounding across all studies. Although the findings presented here should be interpreted with caution, they and the identified gaps in knowledge should provide guidance for clinicians and researchers, and directions for further research.
- Mesa 6 – Patologia dos genitais externos; Torção do cordão espermático; Fimose em idade pediátricaPublication . Marconi, L; Marinho, A; Ramos, M
- Post partial nephrectomy surveillance imaging: an evidence-based approach.Publication . Marconi, L; Gorin, MA; Allaf, METo ensure the early detection of recurrent disease, all patients should undergo routine surveillance following partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. In order to optimize resource allocation and avoid unnecessary radiation exposure, the frequency and duration of surveillance should be tailored to the individual patient's risk of cancer recurrence. The evidence for surveillance after partial nephrectomy is presented reviewing the current literature on prognostic models and proposed surveillance protocols based on the timing and patterns of renal cell carcinoma recurrence. In addition, we review recent guidelines on post partial nephrectomy surveillance as well as the literature on novel imaging techniques that may aid in early disease discovery.
- Será a obesidade um pesadelo na transplantação renal?Publication . Carvalho, J; Nunes, P; Dinis, P; Lourenço, M; Tavares da Silva, E; Parada, B; Marconi, L; Moreira, P; Roseiro, A; Bastos, C; Rolo, F; Dias, V; Figueiredo, A