Browsing by Author "Miguel, C"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Drug Interaction in Psycho-Oncology: Antidepressants and AntineoplasticsPublication . Miguel, C; Albuquerque, EBackground and Objectives: Although there is a growing impact of psychiatric and depressive disorders in cancer patients, literature on the idiosyncrasies of antidepressants (ADs) used in those conditions and their interactions with antineoplastic agents (ANs) is scarce. Sharing the same biotransformation pathways enhances the risk of drug interaction between ADs and ANs, specifically when compounds are inducers, inhibitors or substrates of cytochrome P450 (CYP 450). In cancer patients, such drug interactions may result in less efficacy of the drug and/or increase of their side effects. Therefore, the choice of AD should be cautious (safe and effective) and well supported. The main purpose of this review was to analyze the individual pharmacokinetic properties of the most used ADs and ANs in order to summarize the risk of possible drug interactions between them, anticipating the consequences of their coadministration. Methods: The authors reviewed books and PubMed online articles published in the last 6 years. Results: Most of the ANs are subject to transformation by CYP 450 3A4 and their coadministration with ADs, that have inhibitory properties of this CYP isoform, such as fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine and fluvoxamine, may result in the loss of the AN's efficacy or higher toxicity. Conclusion: Among the ADs, escitalopram, citalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and milnacipran stand out for their weak CYP 450 inhibitory potential and their safety profile in those patients.
- The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilarsPublication . Fonseca, JE; Gonçalves, J; Araújo, F; Cordeiro, I; Teixeira, F; Canhão, H; Pereira da Silva, JA; Garcês, S; Miranda, LC; Ramiro, Sofia; Roxo, Ana; Pimentel-Santos, FM; Tavares, V; Neto, A; Sepriano, A; Malcata, A; Faustino, A; Silva, C; Ambrósio, C; Duarte, C; Miguel, C; Barcelos, F; Santos, H; Cunha, I; Ramos, JC; Melo-Gomes, JA; Pimentão, JB; Costa, L; Maurício, L; Silva, M; Bernardes, M; Bogas, M; Coelho, PC; Monteiro, P; Aguiar, R; André, R; Leitão, R; Pimenta, S; Meirinhos, T; Fernandes, S; Las, V; Castelão, WBiotechnological drugs have become a fundamental resource for the treatment of rheumatic patients. Patent expiry of some of these drugs created the opportunity for biopharmaceutical manufacturers to develop biosimilar drugs intended to be as efficacious as the originator product but with a lower cost to healthcare systems. Due to the complex manufacturing process and highly intricate structure of biologicals, a biosimilar can never be an exact copy of its reference product. Consequently, regulatory authorities issued strict preclinical and clinical guidelines to ensure safety and efficacy equivalence and, in September 2013, the biosimilar of infliximab was the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody to be authorized for use in the European Union. The current document is a position statement of the "Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia" (Portuguese Society of Rheumatology) on the use of biosimilar drugs in rheumatic diseases. Two systematic literature reviews were performed, one concerning clinical trials and the other one concerning international position papers on biosimilars. The results were presented and discussed in a national meeting and a final position document was discussed, written and approved by Portuguese rheumatologists. Briefly, this position statement is contrary to automatic substitution of the originator by the biosimilar, defends either a different INN or the prescription by brand name, supports that switching between biosimilars and the originator molecule should be done after at least 6 months of treatment and based on the attending physician decision and after adequate patient information, recommends the registration of all biosimilar treated patients in Reuma.pt for efficacy, safety and immunogenicity surveillance, following the strategy already ongoing for originators, and opposes to extrapolation of indications approved to the originator to completely different diseases and/or age groups without adequate pre-clinical, safety or efficacy data.