Browsing by Author "Bogas, M"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Recomendações Portuguesas para utilização de Metotrexato no tratamento de doenças reumáticasPublication . Canhão, H; Santos, MJ; Costa, L; Bogas, M; Mourão, AF; Machado, P; Fonseca, JE; Pereira da Silva, JAOBJECTIVES: To develop Portuguese evidence-based recommendations for the use of methotrexate (MTX) in daily clinical practice in rheumatic disorders. METHODS: The Portuguese project was integrated in the multinational 3E Initiative (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) 2007-2008 where a total of 751 rheumatologists from 17 countries have participated. Ten clinical questions concerning the use of MTX in rheumatic diseases were formulated and the Portuguese group added three more questions. A systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and 2005-2007 ACR/EULAR meeting abstracts was conducted. Selected articles were systematically reviewed and the evidence was appraised according to the Oxford Levels of Evidence. In Portugal, a national meeting was held in Obidos on February 15th and 16th, 2008, involving 50 rheumatologists who discussed and voted by Dephi method the recommendations. Finally, the agreement among the rheumatologists and the potential impact on their clinical practice was assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen national key recommendations on the use of MTX were formulated: work-up before starting MTX, optimal dosage and route of administration, use of folic acid, monitoring, management of hepatotoxicity, long-term safety, mono versus combination therapy, management in the peri-operative period, during infections, before/during pregnancy and after clinical remission, screening and treatment of tuberculosis and the role of MTX as a steroid-sparing agent in rheumatic diseases. DISCUSSION: The Portuguese recommendations for the use of MTX in daily clinical practice were developed, which are evidence-based and supported by a panel of 50 rheumatologists, enhancing their validity and practical use. This project was integrated in a multinational initiative that led to the recent publication of ten multinational recommendations which differ from ours in some specific aspects.
- The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilarsPublication . Fonseca, JE; Gonçalves, J; Araújo, F; Cordeiro, I; Teixeira, F; Canhão, H; Pereira da Silva, JA; Garcês, S; Miranda, LC; Ramiro, Sofia; Roxo, Ana; Pimentel-Santos, FM; Tavares, V; Neto, A; Sepriano, A; Malcata, A; Faustino, A; Silva, C; Ambrósio, C; Duarte, C; Miguel, C; Barcelos, F; Santos, H; Cunha, I; Ramos, JC; Melo-Gomes, JA; Pimentão, JB; Costa, L; Maurício, L; Silva, M; Bernardes, M; Bogas, M; Coelho, PC; Monteiro, P; Aguiar, R; André, R; Leitão, R; Pimenta, S; Meirinhos, T; Fernandes, S; Las, V; Castelão, WBiotechnological drugs have become a fundamental resource for the treatment of rheumatic patients. Patent expiry of some of these drugs created the opportunity for biopharmaceutical manufacturers to develop biosimilar drugs intended to be as efficacious as the originator product but with a lower cost to healthcare systems. Due to the complex manufacturing process and highly intricate structure of biologicals, a biosimilar can never be an exact copy of its reference product. Consequently, regulatory authorities issued strict preclinical and clinical guidelines to ensure safety and efficacy equivalence and, in September 2013, the biosimilar of infliximab was the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody to be authorized for use in the European Union. The current document is a position statement of the "Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia" (Portuguese Society of Rheumatology) on the use of biosimilar drugs in rheumatic diseases. Two systematic literature reviews were performed, one concerning clinical trials and the other one concerning international position papers on biosimilars. The results were presented and discussed in a national meeting and a final position document was discussed, written and approved by Portuguese rheumatologists. Briefly, this position statement is contrary to automatic substitution of the originator by the biosimilar, defends either a different INN or the prescription by brand name, supports that switching between biosimilars and the originator molecule should be done after at least 6 months of treatment and based on the attending physician decision and after adequate patient information, recommends the registration of all biosimilar treated patients in Reuma.pt for efficacy, safety and immunogenicity surveillance, following the strategy already ongoing for originators, and opposes to extrapolation of indications approved to the originator to completely different diseases and/or age groups without adequate pre-clinical, safety or efficacy data.